In a significant development, the Supreme Court Registry has declined to list the plea submitted by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal for an extension of his interim bail. This plea was related to a money laundering case linked to the alleged Delhi liquor policy scam, for which Kejriwal is currently under investigation by the Enforcement Directorate (ED)【110†source】【111†source】.
Background of the Case
Arvind Kejriwal was arrested by the ED on March 21, 2024, in connection with the alleged scam. Following his arrest, he was granted interim bail to campaign for the ongoing Lok Sabha elections. However, as his interim bail period approached its end, Kejriwal sought an extension, citing the need to continue his electoral activities.
Court’s Decision
On May 7, 2024, the Supreme Court reserved its decision after hearing arguments from both sides. The bench, led by Justices Sanjeev Khanna and Dipankar Dutta, divided the hearing into two parts: one challenging the legality of Kejriwal’s arrest and the other addressing the interim bail during the election period【110†source】【111†source】.
Despite these hearings, the Registry has now refused to list the plea for an extension, potentially complicating Kejriwal’s campaign efforts. The court had earlier suggested that if granted bail, Kejriwal should stay away from official duties to avoid any influence on the investigation【110†source】.
Implications
This refusal to list the plea signifies a stringent stance taken by the judiciary on matters involving high-profile political figures and underscores the ongoing scrutiny in cases of alleged corruption. The outcome of this legal battle will have significant implications for both Kejriwal’s political career and the broader fight against corruption in India.