In a recent development, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has issued a notice in response to a plea seeking measures to protect citizens from stray dog attacks. The plea specifically requests the court to consider banning the practice of feeding stray dogs without prior approval. This action aims to address the increasing incidents of stray dog attacks on citizens, highlighting the need for a balanced approach between animal welfare and public safety.
Background and Legal Context
The petition points to a growing concern over stray dog attacks, which have resulted in several injuries and, in some instances, fatalities. The petitioner argues that unregulated feeding of stray dogs exacerbates the problem, as it leads to the congregation of dogs in certain areas, increasing the likelihood of aggressive behavior and attacks on people.
Court’s Considerations
The court’s decision to issue a notice indicates a willingness to explore the issue further and seek input from relevant stakeholders. This step aligns with similar actions taken by other high courts in India. For instance, the Bombay High Court recently directed residents who wish to feed stray dogs to do so only at their homes or designated shelters, thereby preventing public nuisances and potential safety hazards【89†source】【92†source】.
Broader Implications
This case underscores a larger debate on how to manage the stray dog population humanely while ensuring public safety. The Supreme Court has previously suggested that those who feed stray dogs should also bear responsibility for their vaccination and overall care, aiming to strike a balance between protecting animals and safeguarding human lives【90†source】【91†source】.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court’s notice marks an important step in addressing this multifaceted issue, which requires careful consideration of both animal rights and public health concerns. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for other regions facing similar challenges.