Search

Build: v1.2.170

Supreme Court Issues Split Verdict on GM Mustard Commercial Sale

The Supreme Court of India delivered a split verdict on the commercial sale of genetically modified (GM) mustard, highlighting the contentious nature of GM crops in the country. The case, which has seen various environmental and public interest groups challenge the government’s decision to allow GM mustard cultivation, resulted in differing opinions among the justices involved.

Background of the Case

Genetically modified mustard, specifically the hybrid variety DMH-11, was developed to increase crop yields and improve resistance to pests and diseases. The Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) and the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change had previously cleared GM mustard for commercial cultivation. However, this decision faced significant opposition from environmentalists and activists who raised concerns about potential health risks and environmental impacts.

The Split Verdict

The bench comprising Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Sudhanshu Dhulia issued the split verdict. One justice supported the commercial release, citing potential agricultural benefits and alignment with global practices. The other justice raised concerns about insufficient safety measures and the need for further precautionary steps to ensure no adverse effects on human health and the environment.

Government’s Stance

The central government has yet to make a final decision on the commercial rollout of GM mustard, indicating that a conclusive stance will be taken by September. The government has been urged to take a well-informed and cautious approach, considering the significant public and environmental stakes involved.

Ongoing Debates and Future Steps

The Supreme Court’s split verdict means the issue is far from resolved. The case will likely be referred to a larger bench for a more definitive judgment. The ongoing debate around GM crops in India continues to be a polarizing topic, balancing agricultural innovation and productivity against potential health and environmental risks.

The Supreme Court’s next hearing on this matter is scheduled for September, where more comprehensive deliberations are expected, potentially involving expert committees and further public comments consultations.

[ajax_lolad_more]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top