Background
The Supreme Court has strongly criticized the Uttar Pradesh government over the demolition of a house belonging to a lawyer and a professor. The bench expressed serious concerns over the manner in which the demolition was carried out, questioning the state’s justification and adherence to due process. The case has drawn widespread attention, with legal experts and civil rights activists condemning the alleged misuse of power.
Court’s Rationale
The court remarked that demolishing private property without following the established legal framework amounts to a blatant violation of fundamental rights. The justices observed that if state authorities begin to take such actions arbitrarily, it could set a dangerous precedent. The bench questioned whether the demolition was an act of retaliation rather than a lawful exercise of authority. It also sought explanations from the state government regarding the procedural safeguards, including prior notice and opportunities for defense, before taking such drastic action.
Existing Measures
Under Indian law, any demolition of private property must comply with municipal regulations and legal procedures. The Supreme Court has previously ruled that demolitions carried out as a form of extrajudicial punishment are unconstitutional. In recent years, there have been multiple instances of demolition drives being challenged in courts, with rulings emphasizing the need for procedural fairness and judicial oversight.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s sharp remarks highlight growing concerns over the alleged misuse of demolition powers by state authorities. The case is likely to set a precedent on whether such actions can be taken without due process, reinforcing the importance of upholding constitutional rights. The matter remains under judicial scrutiny, with the court expected to give further directions on accountability and possible remedies for the affected individuals.