In a significant legal development, the Special Investigation Team (SIT) has moved the Karnataka High Court, contesting the bail granted to JD(S) leader HD Revanna. The SIT’s action follows a contentious bail decision by a lower court that has drawn widespread attention and criticism.
Background of the Case
HD Revanna, a prominent politician and member of the Janata Dal (Secular), was granted conditional bail on May 13, 2024, by a special court for elected representatives in Bengaluru. Revanna had been arrested by the SIT on charges of kidnapping in connection with the alleged sexual abuse case involving his son, Prajwal Revanna, a Member of Parliament from Hassan. The allegations include sexual harassment and kidnapping, with the case stemming from a complaint filed by the son of one of the victims【8†source】【9†source】【10†source】.
The special court granted bail on the condition that Revanna provides a surety of ₹5 lakh and cooperates fully with the investigation. Additional restrictions included barring Revanna from entering KR Nagar in Mysuru, the home district of the survivor, and prohibiting any attempt to tamper with evidence or influence witnesses【9†source】【10†source】.
The SIT’s Move
The SIT’s petition to the High Court argues that the lower court’s decision to grant bail was flawed and failed to consider the severity of the allegations and the risk of evidence tampering. The SIT highlighted that the victim’s statement was recorded four to five days after her rescue, a delay that the SIT claims undermines the integrity of the investigation. The court had noted this delay, casting doubt on the existence of a prima facie case against Revanna【11†source】.
Moreover, the SIT contends that HD Revanna’s significant political influence could potentially intimidate witnesses and obstruct the judicial process. Activists and legal experts have echoed these concerns, emphasizing the power dynamics at play and the need for a thorough and unbiased investigation【12†source】.
Public and Legal Reactions
The bail decision has sparked a public outcry, particularly among women’s rights groups. Maitreyi K, president of the All India Lawyers’ Association for Justice, criticized the bail, asserting that it sends a dangerous message to victims and could deter them from coming forward. BT Venkatesh, a former public prosecutor, emphasized the importance of considering the power and influence of the accused in such cases, which could significantly impact the investigation and the safety of witnesses【12†source】.
The case has also drawn political reactions, with many questioning the judiciary’s ability to handle cases involving high-profile individuals impartially. The allegations against Prajwal Revanna, including the circulation of over 2,900 videos depicting sexual assaults, have added to the case’s complexity and gravity【8†source】【9†source】.
Looking Ahead
The Karnataka High Court is expected to hear the SIT’s petition on May 31, 2024. This case not only highlights the challenges in prosecuting powerful individuals but also underscores the ongoing struggle for justice in cases of sexual violence. The court’s decision will be closely watched as it may set a precedent for handling similar cases in the future【8†source】【10†source】【12†source】.