A petition has been filed before the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi High Court’s recent decision to designate 70 lawyers as Senior Advocates. The petitioners argue that the process was flawed and that it did not adhere to the required legal and procedural standards.
Background:
The Delhi High Court’s Permanent Committee recently selected 70 lawyers for the prestigious Senior Advocate designation, a recognition that reflects exceptional ability, experience, and contribution to the legal profession. This designation allows the appointed lawyers to appear in higher courts and command higher fees.
Petitioner’s Argument:
The petitioners contend that the selection process lacked transparency and fairness. They argue that the appointment was made without adequate consideration of merit and without a clear, defined criterion, thereby undermining the integrity of the Senior Advocate designation.
Court’s Review:
The Supreme Court is expected to examine the legality and transparency of the selection process followed by the Delhi High Court. The Court’s review may involve scrutinizing the criteria used and ensuring that the selection process upholds the principles of fairness and justice.
Conclusion:
The case now awaits the Supreme Court’s response, which could have implications for the future of Senior Advocate appointments in various High Courts across the country.