A group of concerned parents has approached the Supreme Court, challenging the Delhi government’s decision to close schools due to severe air pollution. They argue that closing schools is not a viable solution, as children face similar health risks at home and miss out on critical education.
Background:
Delhi’s air quality has been deteriorating every winter, with hazardous pollution levels prompting emergency measures. Recently, the Delhi government ordered the closure of schools to protect students from exposure to the toxic air. However, this has led to concerns among parents about the adverse impact on children’s learning and overall development.
Petitioners’ Argument:
The parents contend that shutting down schools does not eliminate the health risks associated with air pollution, as children are exposed to the same conditions at home. They highlight that schools often provide better air quality management, including air purifiers and regulated indoor environments. The petitioners further argue that prolonged closures disrupt education and create inequality, particularly for students from underprivileged backgrounds.
Existing Measures:
Delhi has implemented several pollution control measures, including banning construction activities, imposing restrictions on vehicular movement, and advocating work-from-home policies. Despite these efforts, air quality continues to pose severe health risks, necessitating discussions on long-term solutions.
Conclusion:
The plea to the Supreme Court underscores the need for a balanced approach to address air pollution without compromising education. The apex court’s response will be pivotal in determining whether alternative measures can ensure both children’s health and their right to education.