Justice Prathiba M Singh recently highlighted that while artificial intelligence (AI) holds potential as a supportive tool within the judiciary, the role of human judges in adjudication cannot be outsourced to machines. This statement underscores the balance between leveraging technology and preserving the fundamental human element in judicial decision-making.
Background:
As AI technology advances, there has been growing interest in its application within the legal sector, especially to improve efficiency and reduce the backlog of cases. Countries worldwide are exploring AI-driven tools for case management, legal research, and even preliminary assessments. In India, AI is seen as a resource to assist judges with tasks like sorting case records, analyzing legal precedents, and generating insights. However, concerns arise regarding the extent to which AI should influence or participate in actual judicial decisions.
Court’s Rationale:
Justice Prathiba M Singh stressed that, while AI can aid in administrative and analytical tasks, the core function of judgment requires human understanding, empathy, and interpretation, which machines cannot replicate. Adjudication involves assessing complex human circumstances and exercising discretion, areas where reliance on AI could lead to ethical dilemmas or inadequate rulings. She argued that AI should enhance, not replace, human judgment, as judges bring unique insights and moral discernment that are essential for fair outcomes.
Existing Measures:
The Indian judiciary has already begun experimenting with AI tools for administrative purposes, such as digital case management and e-filing systems. The Supreme Court has initiated projects like SUPACE (Supreme Court Portal for Assistance in Court’s Efficiency) to improve workflow. Globally, legal systems are adopting AI selectively, with strict guidelines to ensure human oversight remains central in decision-making.
Conclusion:
Justice Prathiba M Singh’s remarks underscore the judiciary’s cautious approach to AI integration. While AI can provide valuable support, human judges are irreplaceable in rendering justice. This perspective emphasizes the judiciary’s commitment to upholding the integrity and sensitivity of adjudication, ensuring that AI serves as a tool rather than an arbiter. The balance between technology and humanity is crucial in shaping a future-ready yet ethically grounded judiciary.