The Delhi High Court recently quashed a POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) case against a man after observing that the accused had married the victim. The court emphasized the need for a practical approach when dealing with cases involving consensual relationships leading to marriage.
Background:
The case originated when a POCSO complaint was filed against the accused, alleging a relationship with a minor. However, it was later revealed that the accused and the victim were in a consensual relationship, and upon reaching legal age, they got married. The victim, now an adult, supported the quashing of the case, stating that continuing the proceedings would disrupt their marital life.
Court’s Rationale:
The Delhi High Court underscored the importance of considering the broader context in such cases. It highlighted that the purpose of the POCSO Act is to protect children from exploitation, not to penalize consensual relationships that eventually culminate in marriage. The court determined that continuing the case would not serve the interests of justice.
Existing Measures:
The judiciary often adopts a compassionate approach in cases involving consensual relationships where the victim supports the accused. Courts have the discretion to quash proceedings if they believe it aligns with justice, especially when both parties are now legally married and seek to move forward without interference.
Conclusion:
By quashing the POCSO case, the Delhi High Court reiterated the need for a balanced interpretation of the law, particularly in scenarios involving consensual relationships that evolve into lawful marriages. The judgment reflects an effort to ensure that the law is applied without causing unnecessary harm to the lives of individuals involved.