The Delhi High Court has rejected the anticipatory bail plea of a man accused of sexually harassing a minor through Instagram, citing the severity of the allegations and the potential impact on the investigation.
Background:
The case involves accusations of the accused sending inappropriate messages to a minor on the social media platform. The complaint led to the registration of a case under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, which seeks to protect minors from sexual exploitation and abuse.
Court’s Observations:
The High Court underscored the seriousness of offenses against children, asserting that granting bail could hinder the collection of evidence and affect the investigation process. The court prioritized the victim’s welfare and emphasized the need for strict action in such cases.
Existing Measures:
- The POCSO Act enforces strict penalties for offenses involving minors.
- Cybercrime cells actively investigate online harassment and exploitation cases.
Conclusion:
The court’s decision reflects a strong stance against crimes targeting minors and reinforces the judiciary’s role in protecting children from online harassment while ensuring a thorough investigation.