In a recent development, the Centre has informed the Supreme Court that there is no substantial evidence of large-scale irregularities in the NEET UG 2024 examination, thus opposing the calls for its cancellation. This stance comes amidst numerous allegations and petitions from students and various organizations claiming significant discrepancies in the exam process, including paper leaks and unfair awarding of grace marks.
Key Points:
- Centre’s Response:
- The Centre, represented by the Solicitor General, has asserted that the integrity of the NEET UG 2024 examination has been maintained and that the allegations of irregularities are not backed by conclusive evidence. The National Testing Agency (NTA) also supported this claim, stating that the high scores this year can be attributed to updates in NCERT textbooks and the legitimate provision of grace marks to certain candidates who faced time loss due to administrative errors.
- Supreme Court’s Stance:
- The Supreme Court has acknowledged the Centre’s position but also noted the concerns raised about the sanctity of the examination process. While refusing to stay the counselling process for admissions based on the NEET UG results, the Court has sought detailed responses from the NTA and the Centre to address the specific allegations brought forward by the petitioners.
- Public and Political Reactions:
- The controversy surrounding NEET UG 2024 has led to widespread protests by students and calls for a Supreme Court-monitored investigation by political entities, including the Congress party. Leaders such as Jairam Ramesh and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra have been vocal about their demands for transparency and accountability, urging the government to address the grievances of the students thoroughly.
- Implications for Students:
- The ongoing legal and political tussle has created uncertainty for thousands of NEET aspirants. While the Supreme Court has ensured that the counselling process proceeds without interruption, the final resolution of these allegations will be crucial in determining the future course of admissions and maintaining trust in the examination system.
This situation highlights the complex interplay between maintaining examination integrity and addressing the genuine concerns of students and stakeholders in the education system.