Background
The Supreme Court has raised serious concerns over the exemption granted for tree felling in the Taj Trapezium Zone (TTZ) under the guise of agro-forestry. The TTZ, a designated eco-sensitive area covering Agra and surrounding regions, is subject to strict environmental regulations to protect the Taj Mahal from pollution and ecological damage. However, the court observed that allowing large-scale tree felling under agro-forestry exemptions could lead to environmental degradation, potentially endangering the iconic monument.
Court’s Rationale
The bench questioned whether the exemption for tree cutting under agro-forestry was being misused, allowing unchecked deforestation in an area already facing severe environmental stress. The justices expressed concern that such exemptions could undermine conservation efforts and contribute to rising pollution levels. The court also sought clarity on whether adequate compensatory afforestation measures were in place to counterbalance tree loss.
Existing Measures
The TTZ is governed by stringent environmental laws, including a ban on polluting industries and restrictions on construction activities. The Supreme Court has previously intervened in matters related to air pollution, water contamination, and industrial emissions affecting the Taj Mahal. However, the agro-forestry exemption appears to have created a loophole that could be exploited for commercial deforestation, prompting the court’s intervention.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s scrutiny underscores the need for a balanced approach to environmental conservation and agricultural activities in ecologically sensitive zones. The case highlights concerns over regulatory loopholes that may facilitate environmental harm. The court is expected to seek further clarifications from the authorities on whether exemptions are being granted in a manner consistent with conservation principles.