The Madras High Court has called for responses from the Centre and the State government on a petition that seeks to ban online reviews of films for three days after their release. The petition argues that such reviews can negatively influence audience perceptions and impact box-office performance before the public has had a chance to view the film.
Background:
The plea was filed after concerns were raised about online reviews affecting a film’s success, particularly when critical reviews appear too early, potentially leading to a decline in audience interest. The petitioners argue that the delay in publishing reviews would give films a fair chance to succeed or fail based on their own merit, rather than being prematurely judged by online critics.
Court’s Rationale:
The court is examining whether it is feasible and justifiable to impose such a ban, while balancing the right to freedom of speech and expression with the film industry’s interests. In addressing the issue, the court has sought detailed responses from both the Centre and the State government on the matter.
Existing Measures:
Currently, there are no such legal restrictions on posting film reviews, and online platforms have the freedom to publish reviews as soon as they are made available. However, the growing influence of these reviews has led to calls for greater regulation to protect the interests of filmmakers.
Conclusion:
The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent in terms of the regulation of online reviews and their impact on media and entertainment industries. The court’s decision will need to balance multiple concerns, including free speech, consumer rights, and the fair promotion of films.