Justice Abhay S Oka recently advocated that the iconic Bombay High Court building should continue to remain under the control of the judiciary, even after the High Court relocates to a new building in the future. His statement highlights the historical and cultural significance of the current structure and emphasizes its continuing relevance to the legal system.
1. A Heritage of Legal History
Justice Oka underscored that the Bombay High Court building, located in the heart of Mumbai, is not just a physical structure but a symbol of India’s rich legal history. The building, with its stunning Gothic architecture, has been a part of Mumbai’s landscape since the colonial era and holds immense heritage value. Built in 1878, it has witnessed many landmark cases and events that have shaped Indian law and governance.
2. Symbolic Value to Judiciary
Justice Oka emphasized that the building is more than just a courthouse—it represents the institution of justice in India. Its retention by the judiciary, even after the High Court shifts to a new location, would ensure that this symbol of justice remains connected to the people. He suggested that the building could continue to serve judicial or legal purposes, such as housing legal archives, museums, or even functioning as a venue for judicial functions.
3. The Shift to a New Building
Plans for a new Bombay High Court building have been in the works due to the need for a larger, modern facility that can accommodate the growing demands of the judiciary. The current High Court, while iconic, faces space constraints and operational challenges due to its age. The new premises, expected to be equipped with modern infrastructure and technology, will be able to handle a larger volume of cases and provide better facilities for lawyers, judges, and litigants.
4. Preserving Legal Legacy
Justice Oka’s call to preserve the current building for the judiciary aligns with the broader need to protect historical buildings and their legacies. He expressed concerns that if the building were repurposed for non-judicial uses, it might lose its cultural and symbolic value. He proposed that the building could serve as a judicial museum, showcasing the history of the legal system, or as an academic center for law students, scholars, and historians.
5. A Public and Judicial Landmark
Justice Oka’s remarks have also sparked discussions about how to preserve the public memory of significant institutions. The building, with its strong association with landmark trials and celebrated legal minds, should remain accessible to the judiciary and the public, serving as a reminder of the rule of law and justice in India’s democratic framework.
Justice Abhay S Oka’s recommendation to retain the Bombay High Court building within the judiciary, even after the court moves to a new site, underscores the deep symbolic and historical value of this architectural marvel. His vision is to ensure that the building continues to serve as a beacon of justice, linking the past with the present, and reminding future generations of the significant role it has played in the evolution of India’s legal system.